ArticleGenetics2026
Clade distillation for genome-wide association studies.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genealogy-based trait association with LOCATER boosts power at loci with allelic heterogeneity.Genome research · 2026Article
- Multiple-testing corrections in case-control studies using identity-by-descent segments.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- A spectral component approach leveraging identity-by-descent graphs to address recent population structure in genomic analysis.Genome research · 2026Article
- SPC: a SPectral Component approach leveraging Identity-by-Descent graphs to address recent population structure in genomic analysis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Multiple-testing corrections in case-control studies using identity-by-descent segments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Evaluating ARG-estimation methods in the context of estimating population-mean polygenic score histories.Genetics · 2025Article
- Evaluating ARG-estimation methods in the context of estimating population-mean polygenic score histories.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Testing inferred haplotype genealogies for association with phenotypes has been a longstanding goal in human genetics given their potential to detect association signals driven by allelic heterogeneity-when multiple causal variants modulate a phenotype-in both coding and noncoding regions. Recent scalable methods for inferring locus-specific genealogical trees along the genome, or representations thereof, have made substantial progress towards this goal; however, the problem of testing these trees for association with phenotypes has remained unsolved due to the growth in the number of clades with increasing sample size. To address this issue, we introduce several practical improvements to the kalis ancestry inference engine, including a general optimal checkpointing algorithm for decoding hidden Markov models, thereby enabling efficient genome-wide analyses. We then propose LOCATER, a powerful new procedure based on the recently proposed Stable Distillation framework, to test local tree representations for trait association. Although LOCATER is demonstrated here in conjunction with kalis, it may be used for testing output from any ancestry inference engine, regardless of whether such engines return discrete tree structures, relatedness matrices, or some combination of the two at each locus. Using simulated quantitative phenotypes, our results indicate that LOCATER achieves substantial power gains over traditional single marker testing, ARG-Needle, and window-based testing in cases of allelic heterogeneity, while also improving causal region localization. These findings suggest that genealogy-based association testing will be a fruitful approach for gene discovery, especially for signals driven by multiple ultra-rare variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.