ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026
SMART: a new patient similarity estimation framework for enhanced predictive modeling in acute kidney injury.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAccurately measuring patient similarity is essential for precision medicine, enabling personalized predictive modeling, disease subtyping, and individualized treatment by identifying patients with similar characteristics to an index patient. This study aims to develop an electronic health record-based patient similarity estimation framework to enhance personalized predictive modeling for Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), a complex and life-threatening condition where accurate prediction is critical for timely intervention. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe introduce Similarity Measurement for Acute Kidney Injury Risk Tracking (SMART), a new patient similarity estimation framework with 3 key enhancements: (1) overlap weighting to adjust similarity scores; (2) distance measure optimization; and (3) feature type weight optimization. These enhancements were evaluated using internal and external validation datasets from 2 tertiary academic hospitals to predict AKI risk across varying group sizes of similar patients.
resultsThe study analyzed data from 8637 patients in the reference patient pool and 8542 patients in each of the internal and external test sets. Each enhancement was independently evaluated while controlling for other variables to determine its impact on prediction performance. SMART consistently outperformed 3 baseline models on both the internal and external test sets (P<.05) and demonstrated improved performance in certain subpopulations with unique health profiles compared to a traditional machine learning approach. DISCUSSION: SMART improves the identification of high-quality similar patient groups, enhancing the accuracy of personalized AKI prediction across various group sizes. By accurately identifying clinically relevant similar patients, clinicians can tailor treatments more effectively, advancing personalized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.