ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2025
Robust transfer learning for individualized treatment rules in the presence of missing data.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reluctant Transfer Learning in Penalized Regressions for Individualized Treatment Rules Under Effect Heterogeneity.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individualized treatment rule (ITR) is a stepping stone to precision medicine. To ensure validity, ITRs are ideally derived from randomized trial data, but the use cases of ITRs extend beyond these trial populations. Transferring knowledge from experimental data to real-world data is of interest, while experimental data with selective inclusion criteria reflect a population distribution that may differ from the real-world target. In well-designed experiments, granular information crucial to decision making can be thoroughly collected. However, part of this may not be accessible in real-world scenarios. We propose a learning scheme for ITR that simultaneously addresses the issues of covariate shift and missing covariates with a quantile-based optimal treatment objective. Specifically, we compare the outcome uncertainty across treatment arms that is due to missing covariates and use it to guide treatment selection to reduce the likelihood of worse outcomes. The performance of this method is evaluated in simulations and a sepsis data application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.