Trial reportEuropean heart journal2025
Aspirin, cardiovascular events, and major bleeding in older adults: extended follow-up of the ASPREE trial.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discrepancies in low-value practices across cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines. A narrative review.The European journal of general practice · 2026Review
- Long-term SBP time in target and risk of cardiovascular events in older adults: a secondary analysis of the ASPREE cohort.American journal of hypertension · 2026Observational
- Comment on "Cardiac biomarkers in women with high-risk pregnancies: short-term outcomes from the Heidelberg Cardio-Obstetrics Registry".Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Aspirin in Primary Prevention of CVD: A Pragmatic Outline and Advice for Treatment Personalization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Age-Related Platelet Cox-1 Upregulation in Atrial Fibrillation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Potential Effects of Aspirin on Transcription Factors Related to the Inflammation in Atherosclerosis: A Systematic Review.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Formulation Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives of Anti-Inflammatory Natural Products.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- GPs' decision-making behaviour in the prescription of aspirin for primary prevention in elderly individuals: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews in France.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Aspirin and healthy lifespan in older people: main outcome of the ASPREE-XT observational study.The lancet. Healthy longevity · 2025Observational
- Comparative effectiveness and pharmacological fingerprints of indobufen versus rivaroxaban in patients with chronic kidney disease: a single-center, real-world study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsGuidelines recommend against routine initiation of low-dose aspirin in older adults for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events. This study aimed to estimate long-term and post-trial effects of aspirin on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major haemorrhage using extended follow-up of participants from the ASPREE trial.
methodsIn-trial (2010-17) and post-trial (2017-22) data were analysed. At enrolment, participants were aged ≥70 years (≥65 years for US minorities) without prior cardiovascular events, dementia, or independence-limiting physical disability. Randomization was to daily low-dose aspirin or matching placebo for the 4.7 years of the trial.
resultsOf the 19 114 participants randomized (9525 aspirin, 9589 placebo), 15 668 without in-trial MACE consented to post-trial follow-up. No long-term benefit of randomization to aspirin was observed for MACE for the entire in-trial and post-trial period [hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) .94, 1.15]. However, during the post-trial period (median 4.3 years), there was a higher rate of MACE (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01, 1.36) in those randomized to aspirin compared with placebo. Over the entire period, a higher rate of major haemorrhage was observed in the randomized aspirin group compared with placebo (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10, 1.39).
conclusionsThe present study provides novel evidence concerning long-term MACE and haemorrhage following aspirin use in initially healthy older adults. The finding of no long-term MACE benefit needs to be considered in clinical decision-making if aspirin is being considered for use in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.