Observational studyThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025
Blood pressure and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired adults: a multicenter study.
Observational study in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cohort Study for Early Identification of Markers in Cognitively Healthy Family Members of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease
European Prevention of Alzheimer's Dementia (EPAD) Longitudinal Cohort Study (LCS)
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Twenty-four-hour blood pressure and CSF biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in a community cohort.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Hypertension as a Major Risk Factor in Alzheimer's Disease: Mechanisms, Interactions and Therapeutic Perspectives.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Review
- Clarifying what BP Predicts: Commentary on CSF Aβ42/40, p-tau181, and centiloid in unimpaired populations.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Primary Cilia and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Alzheimer's Disease.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertension is a modifiable risk factor for dementia, potentially influencing Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. Understanding this relationship is essential for developing interventions to reduce dementia risk.
objectivesWe investigated cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between blood pressure and AD biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and amyloid (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) in cognitively unimpaired adults.
designProspective observational study.
settingWe analyzed data from cognitively unimpaired participants from three observational prospective European studies: ALFA+ (NCT02485730), EPAD-LCS (NCT02804789), and AMYPAD PNHS (EudraCT: 2018-002,277-22). MEASUREMENTS: ALFA+ participants had either CSF biomarkers (CSF Aβ42, Aβ40, p-tau181, t-tau) and/or Aβ PET data. EPAD participants had CSF biomarkers (CSF Aβ42, p-tau181, t-tau), and AMYPAD participants had Aβ PET data. All participants had available data about diabetes, use of hypertensive medication, and waist-to-hip ratio. Multivariable linear regression models were used to analyze cross-sectional associations between systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP) with CSF biomarkers or Aβ PET (Centiloid units, CL); longitudinal associations were tested by means of delta CL scores between baseline and follow-up to assess Aβ PET changes over time.
resultsWe included 405 participants from ALFA+ (mean age 61.1 years; 60 % female), 1104 from EPAD (mean age 64.8 years; 59.1 % female), and 340 from AMYPAD (mean age 71.8 years; 60 % female). In ALFA+, DBP was negatively associated with CSF Aβ40 (p = 0.016) and p-tau181 (p = 0.050), while there was a non-significant trend towards a positive association between SBP and CL over time (p = 0.058). In EPAD, DBP was negatively associated with CSF Aβ42 (p < 0.001) and p-tau181 (p = 0.014), while PP was positively associated with CSF Aβ42 (p = 0.024). In AMYPAD, SBP (p = 0.002) and PP (p = 0.003) were positively associated with CL at baseline, with a similar non-significant trend being found for DBP (p = 0.089). Higher DBP (p = 0.042) was significantly associated to increased CL over time, with a similar non-significant trend being found for SBP (p = 0.072). We did not find significant associations between blood pressure and longitudinal changes in CSF biomarkers.
conclusionsElevated blood pressure was associated with increased Aβ PET accumulation in cognitively unimpaired individuals. Further research is warranted to elucidate potential mechanisms underlying the negative associations between DBP and CSF biomarkers, which do not reflect the typical AD molecular signature. These findings highlight the relevance of high blood pressure as a potential risk factor for cognitive decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.