ArticleScientific reports2025
Thrombomodulin resistance as a novel prothrombotic pathway in COVID-19.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypercoagulability and endothelial dysfunction are strongly involved in the worsening of the clinical condition in COVID-19 patients. In severe cases, the inflammatory process triggers the release of angiopoietin 2, which could decrease circulating thrombomodulin (TM), a major regulatory mechanism in thrombin generation. Although some studies have described an increased TM resistance, further data are needed to obtain robust results. The objective of our study was to evaluate TM resistance in hospitalized COVID-19 patients using the thrombin generation test and its correlation with development of any severe clinical events (SCE). Forty-seven hospitalized COVID-19 patients were included (median age was 59 years (50-75); 42.6% women). Measurement of endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) revealed that 54.8% of patients had a percentage (%) of ETP inhibition < 40%, suggesting TM resistance. 23% (23%) of patients (n = 11/47) presented at least one SCE. Significant resistance to TM was observed in patients with SCE: percentage (%) of ETP inhibition was 24.3% vs. 47.6% (p = 0.019) in the non-SCE group. Furthermore, lower percentage (%) of ETP inhibition significantly correlated with increased clot stiffness (r= -0.372, p = 0.0167). The percentage (%) of ETP inhibition was a strong predictor of SCE, with an AUC of 0.803 (95%CI: 0.670-0.936). To conclude, thrombin generation can be a powerful tool for risk stratification in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. In addition, increased TM resistance, quantified by a lower percentage (%) of ETP inhibition is strongly associated with the development of SCE and shows promise as a powerful and new independent marker of poor prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.