ArticleJournal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS2025
Genetic Deletion of Sarm1 in Mouse Models of Three Neurological Diseases.
Article in Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Childhood-onset neurodegeneration and brain atrophy: definingJournal of medical genetics · 2026Article
- Junctions in Jeopardy: the neuromuscular junction is a selective pathological target in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Review
- SARM1 Inhibition in Three Mouse Models of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDegeneration of peripheral motor and sensory axons is a key aspect of the pathophysiology of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and related inherited neurodegenerative conditions.
aimsGiven that mutations in many (> 100) genes can cause these disorders, it is unclear if a generalized therapeutic strategy can be identified that will apply across these disease subtypes; however, strategies to prevent or slow axon degeneration are attractive candidates. Wallerian axon degeneration is an active process following insults such as nerve injury, and SARM1 is a central mediator of this process. When SARM1 is inhibited, axons distal to the site of injury persist for weeks rather than degenerating. In addition, SARM1 inhibition or genetic deletion has been shown to provide benefit in acquired neuropathies such as diabetic/metabolic neuropathy and chemotherapy-induced neuropathy in animal models. Here we examined the effects of genetically deleting Sarm1 in mouse models of CMT.
methodsWe bred knockout mice lacking Sarm1 to three different mouse models of CMT or related disorders. These include mice lacking Gjb1, modeling CMT1X, mice with mutations in Kif1a, modeling hereditary sensory neuropathy IIC and spastic paraplegia type 30, and mice lacking Fig4, modeling CMT4J and Yunis-Varon syndrome. Clinically relevant outcomes measures including survival (Kif1a and Fig4), grip strength and motor behavior, peripheral neurophysiology, molecular biomarkers, and nerve histopathology were assessed for each model with and without Sarm1 expression.
resultsNo improvement in the mutant phenotype was found for any model, although elevated levels of circulating neurofilament light chain levels were delayed in the Fig4 mice. Kif1a mice showed deficits slightly earlier in the absence of Sarm1.
interpretationWhile we found no benefit from deleting Sarm1 in these mouse models, they were chosen for their human disease relevance and not for biochemical indicators that SARM1 may be a good target. Thus, SARM1 inhibition may still be effective in other forms of inherited neuropathy, but additional research will be required to identify those candidate subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.