Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799288›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2025

Unveiling Theranostics: Nanocomplex-Assisted Photodynamic Eradication of Aggressive Cancer Cells and Modulation of Tumor-Associated Macrophages.

Austeja Butkute, Evelina Kazlauske, Agata Mlynska, Emile Peciukaityte, Vitalijus Karabanovas, Ricardas Rotomskis, Simona Steponkiene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Austeja Butkute *Laboratory of Immunology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0009-0006-4415-8186
Evelina Kazlauske *Biomedical Physics Laboratory of National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-6088-9495
Agata MlynskaLaboratory of Immunology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-3646-0258
Emile PeciukaityteBiomedical Physics Laboratory of National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0009-0004-8341-3229
Vitalijus KarabanovasBiomedical Physics Laboratory of National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-5029-8840
Ricardas RotomskisBiomedical Physics Laboratory of National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-0825-4884
Simona SteponkieneBiomedical Physics Laboratory of National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-3469-0543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising tool that utilizes photosensitizers (PS) for two functions: cancer imaging by fluorescence (diagnostics), and treatment by the generation of reactive oxygen species (therapy). Despite its theranostic approach, the efficacy of PDT is often hampered by limited penetration of light into tissues, tumor heterogeneity, and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Moreover, diagnostics and treatment are activated simultaneously, without the possibility of switching between two processes. Methods: We used photosensitizer chlorin e6 (Ce6) and luminescent quantum dots (QDs) to create a theranostic nanocomplex. Two different light sources were used (980 nm or 650 nm light) to activate either the photoluminescence of quantum dots (QDs) or the generation of singlet oxygen by Ce6. Four distinct CRC cell lines were utilized to represent tumor heterogeneity. The therapeutic efficacy of nanocomplex was assessed in CRC and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), a key component of the immunosuppressive TME. Immunomodulatory effects were explored by exposing resident and recruited TAM models to a conditioned medium from PDT-treated CRC cells, followed by gene expression analysis. Results: Spectral characterization of the QDs-Ce6 nanocomplex demonstrated selective switching between diagnostic and therapeutic modes. Two-photon absorption was activated in QDs by 980 nm laser, thus broadening its excitation capabilities into the infrared region. The nanocomplex accumulated efficiently and uniformly across all CRC cell lines, regardless of their aggressiveness or drug sensitivity. The effect of nanocomplex-assisted PDT was the same among CRC cell lines, contrasting with the variable sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil. Additionally, the PDT caused M2 macrophages to lose their pro-tumor characteristics while potentiating their ability to present antigens. Additionally, M0 macrophages displayed a reduction in immunosuppressive signaling. Conclusion: The QDs-Ce6 nanocomplex exhibits robust photodynamic cytotoxicity and immunomodulatory potential. These findings highlight the potential of nanocomplex for targeting the aggressive type of tumor cells and the TAM.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPorphyrinsTheranostic NanomedicineTumor-Associated MacrophagesAnimalsCell Line, TumorChlorophyllidesHumansMiceQuantum DotsSinglet OxygenTumor MicroenvironmentChlorophyllidesPhotosensitizing AgentsphytochlorinPorphyrinsSinglet Oxygenimmune cellsnanocomplexphotosensitizerquantum dotstumor microenvironmenttwo-photon absorption

Identifiers

PMID40799288
PMCPMC12341838

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.