ReviewPNAS nexus2025
A synthesis of terrestrial species extinctions in the Macaronesian Islands and their correspondence with human occupancy.
Review in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergent patterns of island biodiversity in the Anthropocene.Science advances · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present the first synthesis of all known terrestrial endemic species extinctions in the biogeographical region of Macaronesia, covering all archipelagos (Azores, Madeira, Selvagens, the Canaries, and Cabo Verde) and multiple taxa (arthropods, birds, bryophytes, fungi, land molluscs, lichens, mammals, reptiles, and vascular plants). This list also includes information on the original distribution of extinct species, extinction chronologies, and likely causes of extinction, as reported by the original works' authors. Our survey identified 220 extinction records, with the highest numbers observed among land snails (111 species), arthropods (55), birds (27), and reptiles (15). The proportional impact of extinction was greatest among vertebrates: birds (50% of the original endemics lost), mammals (43%), and reptiles (28%). Very few extinctions were recorded in vascular plants or bryophytes, and none in fungi or lichens. However, these low levels of loss may partly reflect the scarcity of historical and fossil records for these taxa. Exactly half of the recorded endemic species losses (including nearly all vertebrates, as well as the arthropods and vascular plants) have extinction chronologies matching with the human occupation of the islands, providing a minimum estimate of the number of extinction events that may be directly or indirectly attributed to human activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.