Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799522›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025

Prognostic value of sarcopenia in aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jie He

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jie HeSchool of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and to assess its association with mortality risk. Methods: Relevant studies were identified through searches of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from inception through July 1, 2025. The prevalence of sarcopenia and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated, with heterogeneity evaluated using the Results: Thirty-eight studies were included, with 6 focusing on patients undergoing SAVR and 32 on those undergoing TAVR. Sarcopenia was defined by skeletal mass index in 16 studies, while only 2 studies adopted criteria combining reduced muscle mass with low muscle strength and/or reduced physical performance. Sarcopenia's prevalence among SAVR patients was 31.3% (95% CI 25.3-37.6%). In this cohort, sarcopenia was linked to a significantly higher risk of long-term (≥1 year) mortality (HR = 3.10, 95% CI 2.00-4.79, Conclusion: Despite the variation in diagnostic criteria, sarcopenia is significantly prevalent in both SAVR and TAVR populations, with a clear association with elevated long-term mortality following these procedures. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024606633.

Indexed as

meta-analysisprevalencesarcopeniaSAVRsystematic reviewTAVR

Identifiers

PMID40799522
PMCPMC12339327

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.