Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40799808›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Progress and new challenges in image-based profiling.

Erik Serrano, John Peters, Jesko Wagner, Rebecca E Graham, Zhenghao Chen, Brian Feng, Gisele Miranda, Alexandr A Kalinin, Loan Vulliard, Jenna Tomkinson and 12 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Erik SerranoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine.
John PetersMorgridge Institute for Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Jesko WagnerInstitute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh.
Rebecca E GrahamCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh.
Zhenghao ChenCalico Life Sciences.
Brian FengCalico Life Sciences.
Gisele MirandaComputational Science and Technology, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
Alexandr A KalininImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.
Loan VulliardSystems Immunology and Single-Cell Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ).
Jenna TomkinsonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine.
Cameron MattsonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine.
Michael J LippincottDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine.
Ziqi KangResearch Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki.
Divya SitaniDepartment of Systems Medicine, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE).
Dave BuntenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine.
Srijit SealImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.
Neil O CarragherInstitute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh.
Anne E CarpenterImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.
Shantanu SinghImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.
Paula A Marin ZapataBayer AG.
Juan C CaicedoMorgridge Institute for Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Gregory P WayDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine.

Funding

Research Training for Computation and Informatics in Biology and MedicineT15LM007359 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven, Colin Noel Dewey · 2002 to 2026
$22.6M
Computational Bioscience Program Training GrantT15LM009451 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Katherina Kechris-Mays, Arjun Krishnan · 2007 to 2026
$11.7M
Extracting rich information from biological imagesR35GM122547 · NIGMS · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI Anne E. Carpenter · 2017 to 2026
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122547NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007359NLM NIH HHS T15 LM009451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over two decades, image-based profiling has revolutionized cellular phenotype analysis. Image-based profiling processes rich, high-throughput, microscopy data into unbiased measurements that reveal phenotypic patterns powerful for drug discovery, functional genomics, and cell state classification. Here, we review the evolving computational landscape of image-based profiling, detailing current procedures, discussing limitations, and highlighting future development directions. Deep learning has fundamentally reshaped image-based profiling, improving feature extraction, scalability, and multimodal data integration. Methodological advancements such as single-cell analysis and batch effect correction, drawing inspiration from single-cell transcriptomics, have enhanced analytical precision. The growth of open-source software ecosystems and the development of community-driven standards have further democratized access to image-based profiling, fostering reproducibility and collaboration across research groups. Despite these advancements, the field still faces significant challenges requiring innovative solutions. By focusing on the technical evolution of image-based profiling rather than the wide-ranging biological applications, our aim with this review is to provide researchers with a roadmap for navigating the progress and new challenges in this rapidly advancing domain.

Identifiers

PMID40799808
PMCPMC12340881

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.