ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025
The experiences of mental healthcare users regarding the quality of their major depressive disorder treatment.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Millions of people worldwide are affected by major depressive disorder (MDD). However, those with MDD do not receive treatment. More studies have been conducted on the efficacy of medications rather than the subjective experiences of mental healthcare users (MHCUs). Aim: This study was conducted to investigate the experiences of MHCUs regarding the quality of their MDD treatment and to suggest recommendations that are necessary to bring a positive change towards the quality of MDD treatment. Setting: The study was conducted at a Tshwane District Hospital. Methods: A qualitative, exploratory study was used in this study. Seventeen MHCUs were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using observations, interviews and focus group discussions, and the data were analysed using grounded theory. Results: One theme emerged from this study: 'The holistic treatment approach'. Two sub-themes emerged: 'Administration of service delivery' and 'Challenges of service delivery'. Conclusion: Research findings show that the current treatment of MDD is beneficial. However, challenges exist that negatively affect the quality of the MDD treatment and they need to be addressed urgently by relevant stakeholders. Contribution: The study could contribute through: (1) providing recommendations that, if implemented, could assist the decision-makers and MHCPs in understanding the quality of MDD treatment from the MHCUs' perspective and utilise these for policy development and to make necessary treatment adjustments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.