Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800155›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025

Parental experiences of stillbirth rituals in Limpopo, South Africa.

Lunghile Shivambo, Dumile Gumede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lunghile ShivamboDepartment of Development Studies, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1308-457X
Dumile GumedeDepartment of Development Studies, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8628-5726

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stillbirth remains a significant global health issue. Although extensive literature exists on burial practices for live births, there is a notable gap in evidence regarding the specific cultural practices related to the burial of stillborn infants. Aim: This study examines the burial practices surrounding stillbirth from the perspectives of parents using the lens of cultural relativism. Setting: The study was conducted in the Mopani District, South Africa. Methods: A qualitative approach was used to conduct in-depth interviews with 12 parents who had experienced stillbirth. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, focusing on burial rituals, beliefs and the meaning of these practices in helping parents process their grief. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist was used in preparing the manuscript. Results: Participants described several burial practices performed following stillbirth including preparation of the body of a stillborn infant, selection of a burial site for a stillborn infant, the timing of burial for a stillborn infant, cultural prohibition on men's attendance at the burial of a stillborn infant and sexual practices observed during the mourning period. The cultural significance of these practices was highlighted in terms of subsequent pregnancy. Conclusion: Burial practices performed for stillborn infants are essential for parents to recover from grieving and enable them to hope for a successful subsequent pregnancy. These practices should be respected and integrated into the broader healthcare framework to provide culturally competent bereavement care. Contribution: The study offers an interdisciplinary understanding of the intersection between culture and stillbirth.

Indexed as

burial practicescultural relativismLimpopoparentsSouth Africastillbirth

Identifiers

PMID40800155
PMCPMC12339870

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.