ArticleImmunoTargets and therapy2025
Predicting ICU Admission in Patients with Autoimmune Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Astrocytopathy.
Article in ImmunoTargets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early Clinical and Cerebrospinal Fluid Predictors of 1-Year Recurrence in Autoimmune GFAP Astrocytopathy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy (A-GFAP-A) is an increasingly recognized neurological disorder with significant clinical management challenges, particularly in predicting the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models to identify A-GFAP-A patients at increased risk for ICU admission. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 107 patients (January 2021 - August 2024), randomly assigned to training and validation cohorts (7:3). Variable selection for model development was performed using random forest, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). Logistic regression was used to construct a nomogram, and a decision tree was developed to facilitate rapid clinical decision-making. Model performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Four key predictors of ICU admission were identified: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission, seizures, maximum body temperature, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. The nomogram demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy with AUCs of 0.923 (95% CI, 0.858-0.987) in training cohort, 0.922 (95% CI, 0.836-1.000) in validation cohort, and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.883-0.972) in bootstrap validation. The model showed excellent calibration, and DCA confirmed its clinical utility. The decision tree identified GCS <15, seizures, and temperature >39°C as the most relevant indicators for high-risk stratification. Discussion: This study presents the first validated nomogram and decision tree for ICU admission risk in A-GFAP-A, based on the largest reported cohort to date, providing a valuable tool for clinical decision-making and resource optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.