Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800382›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

MRI-free processing of tau PET images for early detection.

Mackenzie L Carlson, Viktorija Smith, Emily Johns, Christina B Young, Hillary Vossler, Tyler Ward, Theresa M Harrison, Duygu Tosun, Timothy Hohman, Susan M Landau and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterizing amyloid and tau positron emission tomography-based stages across the clinical continuum.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Comparison of two preprocessing methods forEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mackenzie L CarlsonDepartments of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Viktorija SmithDepartments of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Emily JohnsDepartments of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Christina B YoungDepartments of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Hillary VosslerDepartments of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Tyler WardHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Theresa M HarrisonHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Duygu TosunDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Timothy HohmanDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Susan M LandauHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Elizabeth C MorminoDepartments of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Funding

Regional tau deposition and digital assessment of cognition in preclinical AD and MCIK99AG071837 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, CHRISTINA B · 2022 to 2023
$256k
NIA NIH HHS K99 AG071837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tau positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is becoming increasingly common to assess

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s Diseaseimage processingPET imagingtau

Identifiers

PMID40800382
PMCPMC12315776

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.