Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800395›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Non-Gaussian normative modelling with hierarchical Bayesian regression.

Augustijn A A de Boer, Johanna M M Bayer, Seyed Mostafa Kia, Saige Rutherford, Mariam Zabihi, Charlotte Fraza, Pieter Barkema, Lars T Westlye, Ole A Andreassen, Max Hinne and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Structural similarity networks reveal brain vulnerability in dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Lifespan Normative Modeling of Brain Microstructure.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Spectral normative modeling of brain structure.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Normative trajectories of RImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Augustijn A A de BoerDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Johanna M M BayerDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Seyed Mostafa KiaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Saige RutherfordDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mariam ZabihiDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Charlotte FrazaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Pieter BarkemaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lars T WestlyeDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ole A AndreassenNorwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Max HinneDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Christian F BeckmannDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Andre MarquandDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Normative modelling is an emerging technique for parsing heterogeneity in clinical cohorts. This can be implemented in practice using hierarchical Bayesian regression, which provides an elegant probabilistic solution to handle site variation in a federated learning framework. However, applications of this method to date have employed a Gaussian assumption, which may be restrictive in some applications. We have extended the hierarchical Bayesian regression framework to flexibly model non-Gaussian data with heteroskdastic skewness and kurtosis. To this end, we employ a flexible distribution from the sinh-arcsinh (SHASH) family, and introduce a novel reparameterisation and a Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling approach to perform inference in this model. Using a large neuroimaging dataset collected at 82 different sites, we show that the results achieved with this extension are equivalent or better than a warped Bayesian linear regression baseline model on most datasets, while providing better control over the parameters governing the shape of distributions that the approach is able to model. We also demonstrate that the attained flexibility is useful for accurately modelling highly nonlinear relationships between aging and imaging derived phenotypes, which shows that the extension is important for pushing the field of normative modelling forward. All methods described here are available in the open-source pcntoolkit.

Indexed as

hierarchical Bayesian regressionneuroimagingnormative modellingprecision psychiatry

Identifiers

PMID40800395
PMCPMC12247560

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.