Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800397›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Likelihood-free posterior estimation and uncertainty quantification for diffusion MRI models.

Hazhar Sufi Karimi, Arghya Pal, Lipeng Ning, Yogesh Rathi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hazhar Sufi KarimiPsychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory (PNL), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Arghya PalPsychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory (PNL), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Lipeng NingPsychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory (PNL), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Yogesh RathiPsychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory (PNL), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) allows to estimate brain tissue microstructure as well as the connectivity of the white matter (known as tractography). Accurate estimation of the model parameters (by solving the inverse problem) is thus very important to infer the underlying biophysical tissue properties and fiber orientations. Although there has been extensive research on this topic with a myriad of dMRI models, most models use standard nonlinear optimization techniques and only provide an estimate of the model parameters without any information (quantification) about uncertainty in their estimation. Further, the effect of this uncertainty on the estimation of the derived dMRI microstructural measures downstream (e.g., fractional anisotropy) is often unknown and is rarely estimated. To address this issue, we first design a new deep-learning algorithm to identify the number of crossing fibers in each voxel. Then, at each voxel, we propose a robust likelihood-free deep learning method to estimate not only the mean estimate of the parameters of a multi-fiber dMRI model (e.g., the biexponential model), but also its full posterior distribution. The posterior distribution is then used to estimate the uncertainty in the model parameters as well as the derived measures. We perform several synthetic and in-vivo quantitative experiments to demonstrate the robustness of our approach for different noise levels and out-of-distribution test samples. Besides, our approach is computationally fast and requires an order of magnitude less time than standard nonlinear fitting techniques. The proposed method demonstrates much lower error (compared to existing methods) in estimating several metrics, including number of fibers in a voxel, fiber orientation, and tensor eigenvalues. The proposed methodology is quite general and can be used for the estimation of the parameters from any other dMRI model.

Indexed as

diffusion MRIfiber reconstructionparameter estimationposterior estimationuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID40800397
PMCPMC12224435

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.