ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Likelihood-free posterior estimation and uncertainty quantification for diffusion MRI models.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty mapping and probabilistic tractography using Simulation-based Inference in diffusion MRI: A comparison with classical Bayes.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) allows to estimate brain tissue microstructure as well as the connectivity of the white matter (known as tractography). Accurate estimation of the model parameters (by solving the inverse problem) is thus very important to infer the underlying biophysical tissue properties and fiber orientations. Although there has been extensive research on this topic with a myriad of dMRI models, most models use standard nonlinear optimization techniques and only provide an estimate of the model parameters without any information (quantification) about uncertainty in their estimation. Further, the effect of this uncertainty on the estimation of the derived dMRI microstructural measures downstream (e.g., fractional anisotropy) is often unknown and is rarely estimated. To address this issue, we first design a new deep-learning algorithm to identify the number of crossing fibers in each voxel. Then, at each voxel, we propose a robust likelihood-free deep learning method to estimate not only the mean estimate of the parameters of a multi-fiber dMRI model (e.g., the biexponential model), but also its full posterior distribution. The posterior distribution is then used to estimate the uncertainty in the model parameters as well as the derived measures. We perform several synthetic and in-vivo quantitative experiments to demonstrate the robustness of our approach for different noise levels and out-of-distribution test samples. Besides, our approach is computationally fast and requires an order of magnitude less time than standard nonlinear fitting techniques. The proposed method demonstrates much lower error (compared to existing methods) in estimating several metrics, including number of fibers in a voxel, fiber orientation, and tensor eigenvalues. The proposed methodology is quite general and can be used for the estimation of the parameters from any other dMRI model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.