ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Challenges in multi-task learning for fMRI-based diagnosis: Benefits for psychiatric conditions and CNVs would likely require thousands of patients.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing and scaling fMRI features for brain-behavior prediction.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Symptom Prediction in Inpatients With Acute Psychiatric Disorders Using Wearable-Based Deep Learning Models: Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a growing interest in using machine learning (ML) models to perform automatic diagnosis of psychiatric conditions; however, generalising the prediction of ML models to completely independent data can lead to sharp decrease in performance. Patients with different psychiatric diagnoses have traditionally been studied independently, yet there is a growing recognition of neuroimaging signatures shared across them as well as rare genetic copy number variants (CNVs). In this work, we assess the potential of multi-task learning (MTL) to improve accuracy by characterising multiple related conditions with a single model, making use of information shared across diagnostic categories and exposing the model to a larger and more diverse dataset. As a proof of concept, we first established the efficacy of MTL in a context where there is clearly information shared across tasks: the same target (age or sex) is predicted at different sites of data collection in a large functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) dataset compiled from multiple studies. MTL generally led to substantial gains relative to independent prediction at each site. Performing scaling experiments on the UK Biobank, we observed that performance was highly dependent on sample size: for large sample sizes (N > 6000) sex prediction was better using MTL across three sites (N = K per site) than prediction at a single site (N = 3K), but for small samples (N < 500) MTL was actually detrimental for age prediction. We then used established machine-learning methods to benchmark the diagnostic accuracy of each of the 7 CNVs (N = 19-103) and 4 psychiatric conditions (N = 44-472) independently, replicating the accuracy previously reported in the literature on psychiatric conditions. We observed that MTL hurt performance when applied across the full set of diagnoses, and complementary analyses failed to identify pairs of conditions which would benefit from MTL. Taken together, our results show that if a successful multi-task diagnostic model of psychiatric conditions were to be developed with resting-state fMRI, it would likely require datasets with thousands of patients across different diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.