Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800765›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

An evaluation of image-based and statistical techniques for harmonizing brain volume measurements.

Yuan-Chiao Lu, Lianrui Zuo, Yi-Yu Chou, Blake E Dewey, Samuel Remedios, Russell T Shinohara, Sonya U Steele, Govind Nair, Daniel S Reich, Jerry L Prince and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phenotype discovery of traumatic brain injury segmentations from heterogeneous multi-site data.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuan-Chiao LuThe Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9822-1375
Lianrui ZuoVanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering, Nashville, TN, United States.
Yi-Yu ChouThe Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, United States.
Blake E DeweyDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Samuel RemediosDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Russell T ShinoharaDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Sonya U SteeleDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Govind NairTranslational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Daniel S ReichTranslational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Jerry L PrinceDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Dzung L PhamDepartment of Radiology and Bioengineering, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

Resolution Enhancement and Contrast Harmonization for MR NeuroimagingR01EB036013 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jerry L Prince · 2025 to 2026
$920k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB036013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Volumetric analysis of magnetic resonance brain images is often complicated by variations in scanner hardware, software, and acquisition settings. Over the past several years, there has been an increase in the use of retrospective harmonization techniques for addressing these variations. This research evaluates three image harmonization methods-neuroCombat (a statistical batch correction tool), DeepHarmony (a supervised deep learning method based on image-to-image translation), and HACA3 (an unsupervised deep learning image translation approach). The study focuses on their effectiveness in achieving consistent brain volume measurements across differing T1-weighted acquisitions (GRE and MPRAGE) and their ability to detect simulated atrophy changes in the same acquisitions. While all three methods notably enhance the consistency of regional brain volumes compared with unharmonized images, HACA3 demonstrated the lowest measurement variation in terms of absolute volume difference percentage (AVDP) across all brain regions (<3%). It also demonstrated the highest agreement between the coefficient of variation (CV) measurements of GRE and MPRAGE images, evidenced by the smallest mean difference (0.12) and the narrowest 95% confidence intervals ([-1.04, 1.28]), alongside achieving the highest intra-class correlation (ICC) values across all regions (ICC >0.9). In the atrophy simulation experiments, HACA3 consistently achieved the smallest AVDPs across most unchanged brain regions, while DeepHarmony showed significant improvements in several regions, and neuroCombat exhibited higher variability. Additionally, using neuroCombat with training data effectively detected hippocampal atrophy, whereas without training, neuroCombat could not differentiate between images with and without atrophy, highlighting a potential limitation in its ability to detect subtle brain volume changes when training data are unavailable. In most metrics, HACA3 was found to be the most effective for harmonizing MRI data, followed by DeepHarmony, with neuroCombat showing more measurement variability but still offering improvements over unharmonized data.

Indexed as

brain volumesComBatdeep learningimage harmonizationmagnetic resonance imagingsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID40800765
PMCPMC12330838

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.