ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Precise MRI-histology coregistration of paraffin-embedded tissue with blockface imaging.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A pipeline to characterize spinal cord pathology in neurological disorders combining magnetic resonance microscopy and histopathology.Communications medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides 3D spatial information on tissue, yet it lacks at the molecular level. In contrast, histology provides cellular and molecular information, but it lacks the 3D spatial context and direct
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.