ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Delineation of the trigeminal-lateral parabrachial-central amygdala tract in humans.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eyelid heat pain sensitivity in healthy participants.Pain reports · 2025Article
- Regional hypothalamic resting state connectivity with limbic structures: An ultra-high field functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The parabrachial nucleus (PBN) relays interoceptive and exteroceptive information to limbic brain regions. In particular, lateral PBN projections to the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) are thought to encode the affective dimension of pain. Pain in the orofacial region is thought to be more unpleasant than pain elsewhere in the body because the face plays an important role in social interactions, feeding, and exploration. The trigeminal nerve (CN V) carries sensory, including nociceptive, information from the orofacial region to the central nervous system. Canonically, the affective dimension of orofacial pain is thought to be encoded by the medial trigeminothalamic tract, which projects to midline thalamic nuclei and further to limbic brain regions. A preclinical study identified an additional circuit that carries orofacial nociceptive information to subcortical limbic brain regions via the lateral PBN. This circuit, from the CN V to the lateral PBN and further to the CeA, is thought to contribute to the heightened negative affect of orofacial pain. However, the CN V-lateral PBN-CeA circuit has yet to be delineated in humans. Here, we aimed to resolve this circuit in humans with diffusion MRI from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) using probabilistic tractography. We first delineated the tract at 7T (n = 150) to determine whether this tract can be resolved. Next, we delineated the tract at the more readily available, but lower resolution 3T field strength (n = 155). Given the growing evidence of sex differences in pain mechanisms, as a secondary aim, we explored whether sex differences in connectivity strengths of the circuit existed in our sample. The basolateral amygdala (BLAT) was used as a negative control, as we did not anticipate CN V-lPBN-BLAT connectivity. The CN V-lPBN-CeA circuit had significantly stronger connectivity strength than the BLAT circuit at both field strengths (both
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.