Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800968›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Cerebral topographies of perceived and felt emotions.

Heini Saarimäki, Lauri Nummenmaa, Sofia Volynets, Severi Santavirta, Anna Aksiuto, Mikko Sams, Iiro P Jääskeläinen, Juha M Lahnakoski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative neuroanatomy of emotion expression: from flies to humans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heini SaarimäkiHuman Information Processing Laboratory, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Lauri NummenmaaTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Sofia VolynetsBrain and Mind Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.
Severi SantavirtaTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Anna AksiutoBrain and Mind Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.
Mikko SamsDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering and MAGICS-Aalto, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Iiro P JääskeläinenBrain and Mind Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.
Juha M LahnakoskiBrain and Mind Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5223-7822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotions modulate behavioral priorities based on exteroceptive and interoceptive inputs, and the related central and peripheral changes may be experienced subjectively. Yet, it remains unresolved whether the perceptual and subjectively felt components of the emotion processes rely on shared brain mechanisms. We applied functional magnetic resonance imaging, a rich set of emotional movies, and high-dimensional, continuous ratings of perceived and felt emotions in the movies to investigate their cerebral organization. Emotions evoked during natural movie scene perception were represented in the brain across numerous spatial scales and patterns. Perceived and felt emotions generalized both between individuals and between different stimuli depicting the same emotions. The neural affective space demonstrated an anatomical gradient from emotion-general responses in polysensory areas and default mode regions to more emotion-specific discrete processing in subcortical regions. Differences in brain activation during felt and perceived emotions suggest that temporoparietal areas and precuneus have a key role in evaluating the affective value of the sensory input, and subjective emotional state generation is associated with further and significantly stronger recruitment of the temporoparietal junction, anterior prefrontal cortices, cerebellum, and thalamus. These data reveal the similarities and differences of domain-general and emotion-specific affect networks in the brain during a wide range of perceived and felt emotions.

Indexed as

affectbrainfMRImovienaturalistic

Identifiers

PMID40800968
PMCPMC12319791

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.