Evidence mapPaperPMID 40801072Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in lipidology2025

In the wake of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study trial.

Timo E Strandberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in lipidology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Timo E StrandbergDepartment of Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn 1994, the 4S trial was revolutionary by showing that cholesterol lowering with simvastatin reduced, not only atherosclerotic vascular disease (ASCVD) events, but also all-cause mortality as compared to placebo. During the following 30 years, statins have proved to be well tolerated and effective and also paved way for new innovations in the field of dyslipidaemia therapy. RECENT

findingsThe aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge about statins and effects of cholesterol-lowering accumulated in the wake of 4S trial: both vascular and nonvascular benefits, adverse effects, adherence, and statin intolerance. While secondary prevention of ASCVD has emphasized 'the lower the better' in LDL-cholesterol lowering, emerging topic is 'the longer the better' to reduce lifetime LDL burden and achieve full potential of ASCVD prevention. With statins as backbone therapy, new treatment innovations are in trials to better manage all atherosclerotic lipoproteins and residual risk. SUMMARY: After becoming generic, statins are inexpensive and well tolerated therapy with potential to substantially reduce the burden of atherosclerotic vascular disease world-wide. To achieve these goals, both accessibility and adherence are fundamental issues.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsSimvastatinClinical Trials as TopicHumansScandinavian and Nordic CountriesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsSimvastatinadherenceatherosclerotic cardiovascular diseasedyslipidaemiaLDL-cholesterolstatin

Identifiers

PMID40801072
PMCPMC12594149

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.