ReviewJournal of genetics2025
On the reversibility of RNA deamination versus RNA methylation: exploring the proximate and ultimate causes.
Review in Journal of genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A-to-I mRNA editing: Why not simply incorporate inosine during mRNA synthesis?Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Comparative analysis of m6A mRNA modification inFrontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- On the origin, evolution, and maintenance of RNA editing.Nucleic acids research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA modifications play a crucial role in regulating gene expression, splicing, decoding, translation, and degradation. Among the most studied modifications are adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing and N
Indexed as
Identifiers
40801392What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.