ArticleHuman genetics2025
Mutation-aware formulation: a genomic framework for equitable global dermocosmetics.
Article in Human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in dermatogenomics, the global skincare industry continues to rely on generalized formulation strategies that overlook population-specific genetic variation. This study introduces a mutation-aware framework that bridges this translational gap through two novel metrics: the Mutation Burden Index (MBI)-which quantifies regional genetic vulnerability across nine core skin function domains-and the Population Compatibility Burden (PCB)-which measures the alignment between current commercial formulations and regional genomic needs. Using a curated database of more than 200 authenticated cosmeceutical products, we mapped ingredient functionality against regional MBI profiles. Results reveal a stark compatibility gap: regions with the highest burden (e.g., Africa, South Asia) receive the least functionally aligned products, with average compatibility scores as low as 0.35. In contrast, Europe-despite lower burden-achieves scores > 0.70. Simulated formulations informed by MBI scores increased compatibility to > 0.80 in underserved regions, demonstrating the potential for 50% gains in biological relevance without individualized genotyping. A machine learning classifier trained on MBI vectors achieved strong performance (F1 = 0.837), and SHAP-based interpretation highlighted barrier and pigmentation pathways as key drivers of product-region mismatch. In contrast to commercial AI platforms offer black-box personalization with minimal genomic input and no interpretability, our model provides transparent, biologically grounded, and reproducible formulation logic. By repositioning personalization from individual-level luxury to population-scale equity, this work establishes a practical foundation for genomically aligned skincare-anchored in functional biology, enabled by AI, and designed for global impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40801941What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.