SynthesisEuropean journal of epidemiology2025
The relationship between PFAS exposure and dyslipidemia: an updated review, meta-analysis, and evaluation of bias.
Synthesis in European journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is concern that widespread exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) may induce changes in serum lipids, however, current evidence is insufficient to establish causality in humans. This systematic review evaluated 69 articles examining exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) or perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and alterations in adult serum lipid outcomes. The majority of associations for PFOA or PFOS with serum lipids were either not significant, significantly negative, or were mixed versus significantly positive findings, suggesting non-consensus of any associations. A subset of 37 studies were examined via meta-analysis and reviewed for biases. Using pooled estimates, PFOA and PFOS exposure were significantly positively associated with total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). PFOA was significantly positively associated with triglycerides (TG), whereas PFOS had a non-significant positive association with high-density lipoprotein (HDL). TC and LDL estimates demonstrated high heterogeneity, peaking within cross-sectional and non-occupational studies that comprised the majority of the meta-analysis. Conversely, pooled estimates from longitudinal investigations trended towards null and were not significant. Potential reasons for heterogeneity were identified in a bias analysis and primarily included inconsistent confounding controls and possible subject recruitment bias from regions with known PFAS contamination. These factors indicate inconsistencies in PFAS-lipid literature that require further prospective investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40801989What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.