ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Signal mining for non-bleeding adverse event in novel oral anticoagulants: a pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) and Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Safety Comparison Based on Data from EudraVigilance Database.Hematology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are extensively utilized in clinical practice; however, their associated non-bleeding adverse reactions have not been adequately emphasized. This study is based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and analyzes adverse events associated with NOACs from a real-world perspective, particularly focusing on non-bleeding adverse reaction signals, to assess differences in the safety of NOACs and provide early warnings for clinical practice. This study obtained raw data from the FAERS database, ranging from July 1, 2014, to March 31, 2024. The data were deduplicated and merged. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) methods were employed to detect potential signals between NOACs and adverse events (AEs). This study reveals several new and severe adverse reaction signals, indicating non-bleeding adverse effects should receive greater attention when using NOACs. Specifically, significant adverse reaction signals were observed in three organ systems: congenital, familial, and genetic disorders; pregnancy, puerperium, and perinatal conditions; along with blood and lymphatic system disorders. Furthermore, there are differences in safety among NOACs, and each NOAC has its own unique AEs. For example, dabigatran is associated with adverse reactions including incarcerated inguinal hernia strangulated, macular fibrosis, potassium imbalance, acidosis, and mental status changes. For apixaban, there is a need for caution due to potential adverse reactions including visual impairment, benign prostatic hyperplasia, thyroid disorders, and sleep disturbances. Concerning edoxaban, practitioners should be vigilant about potential adverse effects such as lymphatic disorder, dysuria, diplopia, rash morbilliform, and delirium. Additionally, rivaroxaban may lead to complications such as thrombocytosis, alopecia, prostatic varices, menstrual irregularities, adrenomegaly, and organic brain syndrome. This study has found that the non-bleeding adverse events associated with NOACs are linked to multiple organ systems, which requires high vigilance in clinical practice, especially for some easily overlooked systems such as the reproductive system and breast disorders, endocrine disorders, and psychiatric disorders. This research provides important insights into the adverse reactions related to NOACs, highlighting the diversity of their safety profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40802006What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.