Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40802007›Full record

ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026

Determinants of prescribing behaviour of antibacterial drugs in Europe and use of appropriate nomenclature in the literature.

Lilly Josephine Bindel, Roland Seifert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lilly Josephine BindelInstitute of Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Roland SeifertInstitute of Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany. seifert.roland@mh-hannover.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibacterial drugs are used in the treatment of bacterial infections. Increasing bacterial resistance rates are threatening their efficacy and place a huge burden on public health. There is a strong link between consumption and irrational prescribing behaviour versus the development of bacterial resistance. This review summarises important aspects of European prescribing behaviour for antibacterial drugs in primary care. Attributes of rational and irrational prescribing behaviour are explained. The most important determinants are investigated and discussed. An update on the use of appropriate nomenclature is also provided. Based on the findings, proposals for action are presented. Unlike other studies that focus on single determinants or prescribing behaviour on an individual level, this review considers prescribing behaviour at a systemic level. A PubMed search was conducted for search terms of prescribing behaviour. Inclusion criteria were literature published in the last five years (starting from 2020), antibacterial drugs, prescribing behaviour and related factors, Europe or European countries, and primary care. Studies solely referring to the hospital sector were excluded. This is followed by an update to the nomenclature investigation, referring to a previous analysis by Seifert and Schirmer (Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 394:2153-2166 (2021)). Prescribing behaviour is shaped by multiple interrelated systemic and individual-level factors. Systemic factors relate to the structure of the healthcare system, whereas individual determinants refer to the single treatment decisions. In Europe, there is a strong North-South shift, with more rational prescribing in the North and problematic behaviour in the South. No significant improvements in decreasing use or appropriate drug choice have been observed in recent years, and the impact of the pandemic on prescribing practices is negative. The use of appropriate nomenclature in the literature did not improve, with a dominance of problematic terms. Policy measures are considered the most effective way of changing prescribing behaviour. Systemic changes are required before individual prescribing behaviour can improve. Conducted interventions had a positive effect in most cases but varied in their effect. Initial actions include restricting the use of antibacterial drugs to specific indications, making financial changes to encourage the use of first-line drugs, and improving infrastructure to enable targeted treatment through diagnostics. However, regulatory restrictions must be accompanied by guidance and stewardship programmes to improve adherence. In general, reforming the nomenclature in the literature is necessary to improve communication and prevent misunderstandings. Rational prescribing behaviour is a requirement for achieving a decrease in bacterial resistance.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Terminology as TopicDrug PrescriptionsDrug Resistance, BacterialEuropeHumansInappropriate PrescribingAnti-Bacterial AgentsAMCAMRAntibacterial drugAntibioticAntibiotic prescriptionAntibiotic stewardshipAntimicrobial consumptionAWaReEUEuropeHealth systemIrrational prescribing behaviourOne healthRational prescribing behaviourSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID40802007
PMCPMC12894117

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.