ArticleJAMA2025
Dalbavancin for Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: The DOTS Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04775953 (Dalbavancin as an Option for Treatment of S. Aureus Bacteremia), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Dalbavancin as an Option for Treatment of S. Aureus Bacteremia (DOTS): A Phase 2b, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Assessor-Blinded Superiority Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin to Standard of Care Antibiotic Therapy for the Completion of Treatment of Patients With Complicated S. Aureus Bacteremia
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Ceftriaxone for methicillin-susceptibleAnnals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Dalbavancin for infective endocarditis: A systematic review of effectiveness, safety, and dosing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Development and Application of a Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) Endpoint for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Trial
- Pharmacokinetics of Dalbavancin in Complicated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Secondary Analysis of the DOTS Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Review
- Optimizing Treatment of Infective Endocarditis in Patients Who Inject Drugs.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Epidemiology of Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Cocci-Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Population pharmacokinetics of dalbavancin: external validation, model averaging, and implications for precision dosing in prolonged therapy.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- The global epidemiology of MRSA.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Real-World Effectiveness of Dalbavancin in Osteomyelitis Without Implantable Devices: A Retrospective Monocentric Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Practical vs Recent Clinical Trial Use Of Dalbavancin.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- What's Behind DOOR Number 2? Recent Applications From Post-Hoc Analyses of Infectious Diseases Randomized Clinical Trials.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Treatment of Methicillin-ResistantMedicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Patient-reported Perceptions, Experiences, and Preferences Around Intravenous and Oral Antibiotics for the Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- What's Hot This Year in ID Clinical Science 2025.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Review
- Dalbavancin.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Article
- Emergence of Dalbavancin, Vancomycin, and Daptomycin Cross-resistance in MRSA During Long-term LVAD Suppression With Vancomycin Followed by Dalbavancin: Genomic Insights and Synergy With Cefadroxil.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Long-acting glycopeptides: what are the barriers to access in patients who need them most, and how can they be overcome?The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
49 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Dalbavancin is a long-acting intravenous lipoglycopeptide that may be effective for treatment of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia without requiring long-term intravenous access. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dalbavancin vs standard therapy for completion of treatment of complicated S aureus bacteremia. Design, Setting, and Participants: Open-label, assessor-masked, randomized clinical trial conducted from April 2021 to December 2023 at 23 medical centers in the US (n = 22) and Canada (n = 1). Participant follow-up lasted 70 days (180 days for participants with osteomyelitis); date of final follow-up was December 1, 2023. Hospitalized adults with complicated S aureus bacteremia who achieved blood culture clearance following at least 72 hours but no more than 10 days of initial antibacterial therapy were included. Participants were excluded if they had central nervous system infection, retained infected prosthetic material, left-sided endocarditis, or severe immune compromise. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 2 doses of intravenous dalbavancin (n = 100; 1500 mg on days 1 and 8) or 4 to 8 total weeks of standard intravenous therapy (n = 100; cefazolin or antistaphylococcal penicillin if methicillin susceptible; vancomycin or daptomycin if methicillin resistant). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) at day 70, which involved 5 components (clinical success, infectious complications, safety complications, mortality, and health-related quality of life) and was assessed for superiority (achieved if the 95% CI for the probability of dalbavancin having a superior DOOR was >50%). Secondary outcomes included clinical efficacy at day 70 (prespecified noninferiority margin of 20%) and safety. Results: Of 200 participants randomized (mean [SD] age, 56 [16.2] years; 62 females [31%]), 167 (84%) survived to day 70 and had an efficacy assessment. Participants without a day 70 efficacy assessment were treated as clinical failures in the analyses. The probability of a more desirable day 70 outcome with dalbavancin vs standard therapy was 47.7% (95% CI, 39.8% to 55.7%). Regarding secondary outcomes, clinical efficacy was documented in 73 of 100 for dalbavancin and 72 of 100 for standard therapy (difference, 1.0% [95% CI, -11.5% to 13.5%]), meeting the noninferiority criterion. Serious adverse events were reported in 40 of 100 participants who received dalbavancin and 34 of 100 participants who received standard therapy; treatment-related adverse events were uncommon in both groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adult participants with complicated S aureus bacteremia who achieved blood culture clearance, dalbavancin was not superior to standard therapy by desirability of outcome ranking. When considered with other efficacy and safety outcomes these findings may help inform use of dalbavancin in clinical practice. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04775953.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.