Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40804216›Full record

ArticleInfection2025

Long-term outcomes of ICU-acquired infections with a focus on bloodstream infections: a single-center retrospective registry study.

Tero I Ala-Kokko, Jaana M Karhu, Pasi Lehto, Sinikka Sälkiö, Pasi Ohtonen, Hannu Syrjälä

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tero I Ala-KokkoResearch Group of Intensive Care Medicine, Intensive Care Centre, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center (MRC), PO BOX 29, 90029, Oulu, Finland. tero.ala-kokko@pohde.fi.
Jaana M KarhuResearch Group of Intensive Care Medicine, Intensive Care Centre, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center (MRC), PO BOX 29, 90029, Oulu, Finland.
Pasi LehtoResearch Group of Intensive Care Medicine, Intensive Care Centre, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center (MRC), PO BOX 29, 90029, Oulu, Finland.
Sinikka SälkiöResearch Group of Intensive Care Medicine, Intensive Care Centre, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center (MRC), PO BOX 29, 90029, Oulu, Finland.
Pasi OhtonenThe Research Unit of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Hannu SyrjäläResearch Group of Intensive Care Medicine, Intensive Care Centre, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center (MRC), PO BOX 29, 90029, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIntensive care unit (ICU) patients have an increased risk of bacteremia. We aimed to investigate the 5-year outcome of ICU-acquired infections comparing them with ICU patients without new infections. Our second aim was to compare the outcome of Gram-positive, Gram-negative and fungal ICU-acquired bloodstream infections (BSIs).

methodsThis single-center retrospective registry study occurred in an academic teaching hospital during 2000-2017 in a mixed adult ICU consisting of patients who stayed longer than 48 h in the ICU. Data was retrieved from the ICU and hospital electronic data management systems. Three groups were included: no infection and no new antimicrobial treatment, a new ICU-acquired infection with negative blood cultures (BCs), and a new ICU-acquired BSI. A multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the impact of ICU-acquired infection on 5-year mortality.

results1857 had no infection and 768 developed an ICU-acquired infection with positive BCs in 195 cases (25.4%). The adjusted HR was 2.03 (95% CI from 1.76-2.35, p < 0.001) for the impact of ICU-acquired infection on 5-year mortality. The highest median sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) was 7.0 (5.0-8.0) for the no-infection group, 9.0 (7.0-10.0) for the BC-negative ICU-acquired infection group, and 12.0 (9.0-15.0) for the ICU-acquired BSI patients (p < 0.001). The crude 30-day mortalities in the no-infection, the BC-negative, and the BSI groups were 98 (5.5%), 58 (10.1%), and 51 (26.0%), respectively (p < 0.001). The highest median SOFA for Gram-positive BSIs was 11.0 (8.0-13.0), for Gram-negative BSIs 13.0 (11.0-16.0), and for fungal BSIs 12.5 (10.0-16.0) (p = 0.01). The need for RRT was 23.2% (19) in Gram-positive, 29.8% (14) in Gram-negative, and 48.1% (25) in fungal BSIs (p = 0.01). The crude ICU-mortalities were 12.2% (10) in Gram-positive BSIs, 31.9% (15) in Gram-negative BSIs, and 11.5% (6) in fungal BSIs (p = 0.008). Patients with fungal BSI had the worst 5-year outcome, whereas the long-term outcome did not differ between Gram-positive and Gram-negative BSIs.

conclusionsPatients with ICU-acquired infections had three times higher 5-year mortality than non-infected ICU patients. ICU-acquired Gram-negative BSIs had the highest ICU mortality, whereas the long-term outcome did not differ between Gram-negative and Gram-positive ICU-acquired BSIs. Fungal BSI showed the worst long-term outcome.

Indexed as

BacteremiaCross InfectionIntensive Care UnitsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeICU-acquired bacteremiaICU-acquired infectionsLong-term outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40804216
PMCPMC12675641

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.