ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025
A cell type and state specific gene regulation network inference method for immune regulatory analysis.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequence determinant and functional relevance of 8-oxoguanine RNA modification unveiled from foundation-model-based predictor.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Integrative interpretable learning reveals shared patterns of epitranscriptomic regulation across multiple cancer types.BMC biology · 2026Article
- DeepSGE: predicting spatial gene expression using residual network with efficient channel attention and dynamic graph attention network.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Multi-view knowledge-guided flow subgraphs with substructure initialization for explainable DDI prediction.Briefings in functional genomics · 2026Article
- Mechanisms and therapeutic prospects of DNA methylation-mucosal innate immunity crosstalk in inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gene regulatory network inference method based on bulk sequencing data not only confuses different types of cells, but also ignores the phenomenon of network dynamic changes with cell state. Single cell transcriptome sequencing technology provides data support for constructing cell type and state specific gene regulatory networks. This study proposes a method for inferring cell type and state specific gene regulatory networks based on scRNA-seq data, called inferCSN. Firstly, inferCSN infers pseudo temporal information from scRNA-seq data and reorders cells based on this information. Because of the uneven distribution of cells in pseudo temporal information, the regulatory relationship tends to lean towards the high-density areas of cells. Therefore, based on the cell state, we divide the cells into different windows to eliminate the temporal information differences caused by cell density. Then, a sparse regression model, combined with reference network information, is used to construct a cell type-specific regulatory network (CSN) for each window. The experimental results on both simulated and real scRNA-seq datasets show that inferCSN outperforms other methods in multiple performance metrics. In addition, experimental results on datasets of different types (such as steady-state and linear datasets) and scales (different cell and gene numbers) show that inferCSN is robust. To further demonstrate the effectiveness and application prospects of inferCSN, we analyzed the gene regulatory network of T cells in different states and different tumor subclons within the tumor microenvironment, and we found that comparing the regulatory networks in different states can reveal immune suppression related signaling pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.