ArticleClinical and translational allergy2025
Implementation of Rapid Drug Desensitization in Antineoplastic Drug Therapy in Denmark Using One-Bag Protocols.
Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standards for practical management of drug hypersensitivity reactions to intravenous drugs and proactive early allergy involvement before referral: A WAO Statement.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026Review
- Implementation of Rapid Drug Desensitization in Antineoplastic Drug Therapy in Denmark Using One-Bag Protocols.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRapid drug desensitization (RDD) is the cornerstone of managing patients with immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions (IDHR) to antineoplastic drugs in Southern Europe and the United States. As the first in Northern Europe, an allergy treatment program that includes RDD and drug provocation testing (DPT) was implemented for Danish patients with cancer. We report the results of this allergy intervention, the number of successful treatments, the fraction, timing and severity of breakthrough reactions (BTR) and the actual treatment duration of RDD procedures.
methodsThis was a prospective observational study. Patients with IDHRs to antineoplastic drugs referred to the allergy treatment program were included. Patients were followed up until finalization of DPT and/or RDD. RDDs were performed according to one-bag RDD-protocols with drug concentrations strictly following manufacturer's instructions and infusion sets primed with flushing fluid. The outcome of DPTs and RDDs were recorded together with detailed information on BTRs and treatment duration of RDD-procedures.
resultsDuring 28 months, 72 patients were included. With DPT, a safe drug alternative was found for five drugs, hypersensitivity was ruled out for six, and one treatment was discontinued after a positive DPT. RDD was performed in 60 patients. Of 248 initiated RDD procedures, 247 were completed. BTRs were observed in 53% of patients and 27% of RDD-procedures, with most BTRs being mild to moderate. The treatment duration was below 6 hours in 96% of RDD procedures.
conclusionThe allergy treatment program, which included DPT and one-bag RDD-protocols, allowed patients to continue critical antineoplastic treatments despite IDHRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.