SynthesisReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2025
The effectiveness of stem cell‑derived extracellular vesicles therapy for intrauterine adhesions: a meta-analysis of preclinical studies.
Synthesis in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endometrial Repair and Regenerative Medicine: From Broad-Spectrum Regeneration to Precision Intervention.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Review
- Amniotic extracellular vesicles' effect on equine endometrial cells challenged with LPS: a proteomic analysis.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe therapeutic potential of stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) for intrauterine adhesions (IUA) has attracted increasing preclinical investigation, yet a comprehensive and up-to-date meta-analysis is currently lacking. Before moving forward with clinical applications, it is essential to fully understand the impact of stem cell-derived EVs on IUA.
methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science were searched up to May 19th 2025. Trial sequential analysis was conducted to evaluate outcomes, while sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment were conducted using Stata 14.
resultsAcross 26 studies (899 animals), our analyses have uncovered several important findings as the following: stem cell-derived EVs significantly improved the number of endometrial glands (SMD = 3.78; 95% CI: 2.62 ~ 4.93; P < 0.00001); endometrial thickness (SMD = 2.65; 95% CI: 1.90 ~ 3.40; P < 0.00001) and the number of embryos (SMD = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.02 ~ 2.97; P = 0.0004); fibrosis reduction (SMD = -3.25; 95% CI: -4.24~ -2.26; P < 0.00001) in IUA animal models. EVs downregulated fibrosis markers (TGF-β1, α-SMA, Col-1) and upregulated vascularization (VEGF) and proliferation (Ki67) genes.
conclusionsStem cell-derived EVs demonstrate safety and efficacy in treating IUA animal models, with potential improvements in fertility outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.