ReviewCancers2025
Impact of Anastomotic Leak on Long-Term Survival After Gastrectomy: Results from an Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indocyanine green-guided lymphadenectomy and survival of patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of time-to-event data.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Development of a postoperative risk scoring tool for elderly patients with early gastric cancer: an exploratory prognostic score derivation study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical risk factors for multidrug-resistant organism infections in postoperative gastric cancer patients: an ICU-based retrospective analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnastomotic leak (AL) is a serious complication after gastrectomy. It is associated with prolonged hospital stay, greater expenses, and increased risk for 90-day mortality. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the effect of AL on OS in patients with GC undergoing gastrectomy. This study was designed to investigate the effect of AL on long-term survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
methodsPubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library were queried during the search process. The literature search started in January 2025 and was updated in May 2025. The studies analyzed the impact of AL on long-term survival, with the primary outcome being long-term overall survival. Pooled effect size measures included restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsTen studies (11,862 patients) were included. Overall, 338 (2.9%) patients experienced AL. The RMSTD analysis indicates that at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months, patients with AL tend to live 1.1, 3.1, 5.2, 8.1, and 10.6 months shorter, respectively, compared to those who did not develop AL. All results were statistically significant with
conclusionsThis research appears to indicate a clinical impact of AL on long-term OS after gastrectomy. Patients experiencing AL appear to have an increased risk of mortality within the initial four years of follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.