ArticleCancers2025
Investigating the Influence of Conventional vs. Ultra-High Dose Rate Proton Irradiation Under Normoxic or Hypoxic Conditions on Multiple Developmental Endpoints in Zebrafish Embryos.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early molecular changes induced by FLASH irradiation in MCF10A and MDA-MB-231 breast cell lines.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate how the FLASH effect modulates radiation response on multiple developmental endpoints of zebrafish embryos under normoxic and hypoxic conditions, after irradiation with proton beams at a conventional and an ultra-high dose rate (UHDR).
methodsEmbryos were obtained from adult zebrafish and irradiated with a 228 MeV proton beam 24 h post-fertilization (hpf) at a dose rate of 0.6 and 317 Gy/s. For the hypoxic group, samples were kept inside a hypoxic chamber prior to irradiation, while standard incubation was adopted for the normoxic group. After irradiation, images of single embryos were acquired, and radiation effects on larval length, yolk absorption, pericardial edema, head size, eye size, and spinal curvature were assessed at specific time points.
resultsData indicate a general trend of significantly reduced toxicity after exposure to a UHDR compared to conventional regimes, which is maintained under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Differences are significant for the levels of pericardial edema induced by a UHDR versus conventional irradiation in normoxic conditions, and for eye and head size in hypoxic conditions. The toxicity scoring analysis shows a tendency toward a protective effect of the UHDR, which appears to be associated with a lower percentage of embryos in the high score categories.
conclusionsA radioprotective effect at a UHDR is observed both for normoxic (pericardial edema) and hypoxic (head and eye size) conditions. These results suggest that while the UHDR may preserve a potential to reduce radiation-induced damage, its protective effects are endpoint-dependent; the role of oxygenation might also be dependent on the tissue involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.