Evidence mapPaperPMID 40805992Full record

ReviewNutrients2025

Does Energy Restriction and Loss of Body Fat Account for the Effect of Intermittent Fasting on Cognitive Function?

Fulvia Draicchio, Kathleen V Axen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fulvia DraicchioDepartment of Health and Nutrition Sciences, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11215, USA.
Kathleen V AxenDepartment of Health and Nutrition Sciences, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11215, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intermittent fasting (IF) and caloric restriction (CR) have garnered attention for their potential to enhance cognitive function, particularly in aging and metabolically compromised populations. This narrative review critically examines whether the cognitive benefits of IF are attributable to its specific fasting patterns or are instead mediated by the production of weight loss, fat loss, and improvements in insulin sensitivity. Evidence from human trials suggests that reductions in body weight, especially visceral adiposity, and improvements in insulin resistance are key factors linked to enhanced cognitive performance. Comparisons between the results of IF and CR trials show comparable cognitive outcomes, supporting the idea that negative energy balance, rather than fasting or altered eating patterns, drive these effects. However, further investigation of specific types of IF patterns, as well as possible cognitive domains to be affected, may identify mechanisms through which IF can yield benefits on neurocognitive health beyond those of loss of body fat and its accompanying inflammatory state.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueCaloric RestrictionCognitionFastingAdiposityEnergy MetabolismHumansInsulin ResistanceIntermittent FastingWeight Lossbody fatbrain healthcaloric restriction (CR)cognitive functionInflammationinsulin resistanceintermittent fasting (IF)Time-Restricted eating (TRE)visceral adiposityweight loss

Identifiers

PMID40805992
PMCPMC12348356

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.