ReviewNutrients2025
Does Energy Restriction and Loss of Body Fat Account for the Effect of Intermittent Fasting on Cognitive Function?
Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intermittent Fasting: Health Impacts and Therapeutic Potential.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Current Strategies for Healthy Aging: The Interplay Between Nutrition, Metabolism, and Exercise.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intermittent fasting (IF) and caloric restriction (CR) have garnered attention for their potential to enhance cognitive function, particularly in aging and metabolically compromised populations. This narrative review critically examines whether the cognitive benefits of IF are attributable to its specific fasting patterns or are instead mediated by the production of weight loss, fat loss, and improvements in insulin sensitivity. Evidence from human trials suggests that reductions in body weight, especially visceral adiposity, and improvements in insulin resistance are key factors linked to enhanced cognitive performance. Comparisons between the results of IF and CR trials show comparable cognitive outcomes, supporting the idea that negative energy balance, rather than fasting or altered eating patterns, drive these effects. However, further investigation of specific types of IF patterns, as well as possible cognitive domains to be affected, may identify mechanisms through which IF can yield benefits on neurocognitive health beyond those of loss of body fat and its accompanying inflammatory state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.