ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Hydroxyapatite Scaffold and Bioactive Factor Combination as a Tool to Improve Osteogenesis, In Vitro and In Vivo Experiments Using Phage Display Technology.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Formation of 3D Human Osteoblast Spheroids Incorporating Extracellular Matrix-Mimetic Phage Peptides as a Surrogate Bone Tissue Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells have been widely investigated in the field of regenerative medicine and also used as a model to study the differentiation-induction properties of a variety of biomaterials. This study evaluates the osteoinductive potential of novel hydroxyapatite scaffolds functionalized with a phage-displayed peptide (SC1) selected via biopanning for its similarity to bone matrix proteins. The peptide, identified through sequence alignment as a mimotope of osteonectin (SPARC), was used to functionalize scaffolds. Results from SC1 were gathered at different time points (14, 28 and 46 days) and compared with those from nonfunctionalized hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds. In vitro experiments, by seeding human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs), indicated satisfactory biocompatibility for both types of scaffolds. Histochemical observations showed that SC1, better than HA scaffolds, was able to improve hASC osteogenic differentiation, as evaluated through Alizarin Red staining (showing on average a darker staining of 100%). An increase was also observed, especially at early stages (14 days), for osterix (up to 60% increase) and osteonectin immunoexpression (up to 50% increase). In in vivo experiments, cell-free scaffolds of both types were subcutaneously implanted into the backs of mice and analyzed after 2, 4, 8 and 16 weeks. Also, in this case, SC1 more effectively promoted the osteogenic differentiation of infiltrated resident cells. In particular, increased immunoexpression of osterix and osteonectin (+30% and 35%, respectively) was found already at 2 weeks. It can be concluded that SC1 scaffolds may represent a valuable tool to address critical-sized bone defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.