Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40806172›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Hydroxyapatite Scaffold and Bioactive Factor Combination as a Tool to Improve Osteogenesis, In Vitro and In Vivo Experiments Using Phage Display Technology.

Debora Lo Furno, Ivana R Romano, Vincenzo Russo, Maria Giovanna Rizzo, Giuliana Mannino, Giovanna Calabrese, Rosario Giuffrida, Simona D'Aprile, Lucia Salvatorelli, Gaetano Magro and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Debora Lo FurnoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 97, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1971-8990
Ivana R RomanoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 97, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Vincenzo RussoDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 97, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Maria Giovanna RizzoDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences (ChiBioFarAm), University of Messina, Viale F. Stagno d'Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6781-6387
Giuliana ManninoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore", 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-4154
Giovanna CalabreseDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences (ChiBioFarAm), University of Messina, Viale F. Stagno d'Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1937-5403
Rosario GiuffridaDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 97, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7494-3675
Simona D'AprileDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 97, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-0810-6121
Lucia SalvatorelliDepartment of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 87, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Gaetano MagroDepartment of Medical, Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 87, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Riccardo BendoniFin-Ceramica Faenza SPA, Via Granarolo 177/3, 48018 Faenza, Italy.
Laura DolciniFin-Ceramica Faenza SPA, Via Granarolo 177/3, 48018 Faenza, Italy.
Agata ZappalàDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 97, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Salvatore P P GuglielminoDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences (ChiBioFarAm), University of Messina, Viale F. Stagno d'Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy.
Sabrina ConociDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences (ChiBioFarAm), University of Messina, Viale F. Stagno d'Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy.
Rosalba ParentiDepartment of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, Via Santa Sofia 97, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1614-4696

Funding

Italian PON Project-BONE++, Development of Micro and Nanotechnologies for Predictivity, Di-agnosis, Therapy and Regenerative Treatments of Pathological Bone and Osteo-Articular Altera-tions ARS01_00693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells have been widely investigated in the field of regenerative medicine and also used as a model to study the differentiation-induction properties of a variety of biomaterials. This study evaluates the osteoinductive potential of novel hydroxyapatite scaffolds functionalized with a phage-displayed peptide (SC1) selected via biopanning for its similarity to bone matrix proteins. The peptide, identified through sequence alignment as a mimotope of osteonectin (SPARC), was used to functionalize scaffolds. Results from SC1 were gathered at different time points (14, 28 and 46 days) and compared with those from nonfunctionalized hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds. In vitro experiments, by seeding human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs), indicated satisfactory biocompatibility for both types of scaffolds. Histochemical observations showed that SC1, better than HA scaffolds, was able to improve hASC osteogenic differentiation, as evaluated through Alizarin Red staining (showing on average a darker staining of 100%). An increase was also observed, especially at early stages (14 days), for osterix (up to 60% increase) and osteonectin immunoexpression (up to 50% increase). In in vivo experiments, cell-free scaffolds of both types were subcutaneously implanted into the backs of mice and analyzed after 2, 4, 8 and 16 weeks. Also, in this case, SC1 more effectively promoted the osteogenic differentiation of infiltrated resident cells. In particular, increased immunoexpression of osterix and osteonectin (+30% and 35%, respectively) was found already at 2 weeks. It can be concluded that SC1 scaffolds may represent a valuable tool to address critical-sized bone defects.

Indexed as

DurapatiteOsteogenesisTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceOsteonectinPeptide LibraryTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsDurapatiteOsteonectinPeptide Libraryfemale BALB/c micehuman adipose-derived stem cellshydroxyapatite scaffoldsosteogenic differentiationphage displayregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID40806172
PMCPMC12346526

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.