ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
H
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Electromechanical Connectome: Integrating Voltage, Mechanical Nano-Forces, and Subcellular Fluid Phase Dynamics in Human Neural Computation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanism by which voltage-gated ion channels open and close has been the subject of intensive investigation for decades. For a large class of potassium channels and related sodium channels, the consensus has been that the gating current preceding the main ionic current is a large movement of positively charged segments of protein from voltage-sensing domains that are mechanically connected to the gate through linker sections of the protein, thus opening and closing the gate. We have pointed out that this mechanism is based on evidence that has alternate interpretations in which protons move. Very little literature considers the role of water and protons in gating, although water must be present, and there is evidence that protons can move in related channels. It is known that water has properties in confined spaces and at the surface of proteins different from those in bulk water. In addition, there is the possibility of quantum properties that are associated with mobile protons and the hydrogen bonds that must be present in the pore; these are likely to be of major importance in gating. In this review, we consider the evidence that indicates a central role for water and the mobility of protons, as well as alternate ways to interpret the evidence of the standard model in which a segment of protein moves. We discuss evidence that includes the importance of quantum effects and hydrogen bonding in confined spaces. K
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.