ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Liquid Biopsy and Epigenetic Signatures in AML, ALL, and CNS Tumors: Diagnostic and Monitoring Perspectives.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of epigenetic alterations in canine mammary cancer.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy and Multi-Omic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Innovations in Early Detection, Therapy Guidance, and Disease Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Hematological Biomarkers for Early Detection of Lung Cancer: Evaluating the Diagnostic Potential of Circulating Interleukin Levels.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Exosomal biomarkers in leukemia: translational potential and regulatory challenges for precision medicine applications.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To deliver the most effective cancer treatment, clinicians require rapid and accurate diagnoses that delineate tumor type, stage, and prognosis. Consequently, minimizing the need for repetitive and invasive procedures like biopsies and myelograms, along with their associated risks, is a critical challenge. Non-invasive monitoring offers a promising avenue for tumor detection, screening, and prognostication. While the identification of oncogenes and biomarkers from circulating tumor cells or tissue biopsies is currently standard practice for cancer diagnosis and classification, accumulating evidence underscores the significant role of epigenetics in regulating stem cell fate, including proliferation, self-renewal, and malignant transformation. This highlights the importance of analyzing the methylome, exosomes, and circulating RNA for detecting cellular transformation. The development of diagnostic assays that integrate liquid biopsies with epigenetic analysis holds immense potential for revolutionizing tumor management by enabling rapid, non-invasive diagnosis, real-time monitoring, and personalized treatment decisions. This review covers current studies exploring the use of epigenetic regulation, specifically the methylome and circulating RNA, as diagnostic tools derived from liquid biopsies. This approach shows promise in facilitating the differentiation between primary central nervous system lymphoma and other central nervous system tumors and may enable the detection and monitoring of acute myeloid/lymphoid leukemia. We also discuss the current limitations hindering the rapid clinical translation of these technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.