ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Fractional Flow Reserve in the Left Anterior Descending Artery.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of D-SPECT-derived myocardial flow reserve in detecting coronary microvascular disease and predicting outcomes after complete revascularization: a two-center pilot study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- The prognostic value of multiparameters derived from D-SPECT in patients with ANOCA.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Vessel-Specific Differences in Fractional Flow Reserve Among Intermediate Coronary Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Intramyocardial Left Anterior Descending Artery Extending Toward the Right Ventricle Demonstrated on Coronary CT Angiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a standard physiological index for guiding coronary revascularization, with a threshold of >0.80 typically used to defer intervention. However, due to its distinct anatomical and physiological features, the left anterior descending artery (LAD) often exhibits lower FFR values than non-LAD vessels for lesions of similar angiographic severity. These vessel-specific differences raise concerns about applying a uniform FFR cutoff across all coronary territories. Observational studies indicate that LAD lesions deferred at an FFR of 0.80 may have similar or better outcomes than non-LAD lesions do. LAD lesions also tend to show lower post-percutaneous coronary intervention FFR values, suggesting that vessel specific target thresholds may be more prognostically appropriate. Additionally, some evidence suggests that instantaneous wave-free ratio may offer greater prognostic value than FFR, specifically in LAD lesions, a trend not consistently seen in other arteries. In patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, the prognostic relevance of non-culprit lesion FFR may vary by coronary territory, particularly in the LAD. This review outlines the physiological rationale and clinical evidence for vessel-specific interpretation of FFR, with a focus on the LAD, and explores its potential clinical implications and limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.