ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Focal Disease in Older and Complex Patients-What Could Be the Best Time for an Appropriate Interventional Treatment?
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Changing trends in burden of calcific aortic valve diseases and degenerative mitral valve diseases among people aged 60-89 years from 1990 to 2030.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calcific aortic stenosis (CAS) is a newly emerging pandemic in elderly individuals due to the aging of the population in the world. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR) and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) are the cornerstone of the management of severe aortic stenosis accompanied by one or more symptoms. Moreover, an appropriate interventional treatment of CAS, in elderly patients, is a very complex decision for heart teams, to avoid bad outcomes such as operative mortality, cardiovascular and all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure, worsening of quality of life. In fact, CAS in the elderly is not only a focal valve disease, but a very complex clinical picture with different risk factors and etiologies, differing underlying pathophysiology, large phenotypic heterogeneity in a context of subjective biological, phenotypic and functional aging until frailty and disability. In this review, we analyzed separately and in a more integrated manner, the natural and prognostic histories of the progression of aortic stenosis, the phenotypes of myocardial damage and heart failure, within the metrics and aging trajectory. The aim is to suggest, during the clinical timing of valve disease, the best interval time for an appropriate and effective interventional treatment in each older patient, beyond subjective symptoms by integration of clinical, geriatric, chemical, and advanced imaging biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.