Simultaneous Determination of 16 Phenolic Compounds in Edible Fruits from Spontaneous Species Using HPLC-DAD.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Enhanced polyphenolic production in tissue culture-derived Opuntia ficus-indica increases larvicidal activity against Spodoptera exigua: biochemical, histological and molecular docking evidence.Scientific reports · 2026
   Article
2. Effects of Extruded Sugar Beet Pulp By-Product on Bioactive Composition, Antioxidant Activity, and Quality of Classic and High-Protein Gluten-Free Pasta.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Article
3. Exploring the changes in anticoagulant active ingredients before and after bovine bile fermentation of the traditional Chinese medicine YaomuRSC advances · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as