ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Electrochemical Biosensors Driving Model Transformation for Food Testing.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Metal-Organic Framework-Based Electrochemiluminescence Sensors for Mycotoxin Detection in Food.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Meat-Borne Bacterial Pathogen Detection: Conventional, Molecular and Emerging AI-Based Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection of Milk Adulterants.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Tracking Cadmium Transfer from Soil to Cup: An Electrochemical Sensing Strategy Based on BiFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrochemical biosensors are revolutionizing food testing by addressing critical limitations of conventional strategies that suffer from cost, complexity, and field-deployment challenges. Emerging fluorescence and Raman techniques, while promising, face intrinsic drawbacks like photobleaching and matrix interference in opaque or heterogeneous samples. In contrast, electrochemical biosensors leverage electrical signals to bypass optical constraints, enabling rapid, cost-effective, and pretreatment-free analysis of turbid food matrices. This review highlights their operational mechanisms, emphasizing nano-enhanced signal amplification (e.g., Au nanoparticles and graphene) and biorecognition elements (antibodies, aptamers, and molecularly imprinted polymers) for ultrasensitive assay of contaminants, additives, and adulterants. By integrating portability, scalability, and real-time capabilities, electrochemical biosensors align with global food safety regulations and sustainability goals. Challenges in standardization, multiplexed analysis, and long-term stability are discussed, alongside future directions toward AI-driven analytics, biodegradable sensors, and blockchain-enabled traceability, ultimately fostering precision-driven, next-generation food safety and quality testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.