ArticleJournal of biochemical and molecular toxicology2025
Pyrrolo-Fused Phenanthridines as Potential Anticancer Agents: Synthesis, Prediction, and Biological Evaluation.
Article in Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reinvestigating Pyrrol-2-One-Based Compounds: From Antimicrobial Agents to Promising Antitumor Candidates.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We report the synthesis of four novel monoquaternary salts and four fused pyrrolo-phenanthridine compounds, fully characterized by NMR, FT-IR, and mass spectrometry. Guided by theoretical predictions, including molecular docking studies, we assessed their cytotoxic activity and biocompatibility. The docking results revealed notably stronger binding affinities compared to Phenstatin, a known anticancer agent, suggesting high therapeutic promise. In vitro cytotoxicity was evaluated on osteosarcoma cell lines HOS and MG-63, showing a marked cell-line-dependent response: all compounds inhibited MG-63 cell viability by approximately 50%, while their effect on HOS cells was more modest (20%-30%). No significant activity was observed against the MeWo melanoma line. Nonetheless, compounds 3a-d, 5a, and 5b demonstrated good biocompatibility at 10 and 50 µM and selective cytotoxicity toward MG-63 cells. These findings, combined with favorable docking profiles, highlight the potential of these compounds as anticancer candidates and justify further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.