ArticleEvaluation & the health professions2026
Mapping Longitudinal Dynamics of Learning Communities Dealing With Dutch Healthy Weight Approaches: An Updated Causal Loop Diagram.
Article in Evaluation & the health professions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Longitudinal Dynamics of Learning Communities Dealing With Dutch Healthy Weight Approaches: An Updated Causal Loop Diagram.Evaluation & the health professions · 2026Article
- [In-depth methods for optimizing learning communities: development and application experiences].TSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning communities (LCs) stimulate the learning and cross-sectoral collaboration that are essential in multidisciplinary challenges, such as healthy weight approaches (HWAs). Previous research on two multidisciplinary LCs about HWAs devised a causal loop diagram (CLD) identifying dynamics (i.e., mechanisms) that describe the functioning of LCs during their starting phase (first 6 months after LC start). As LCs are likely to develop over project phases, this study aimed to ascertain whether and how the LC system dynamics were perceived to develop over time. Qualitative interviews conducted with the LC members at a second juncture were processed to be able to update the initial CLD. The updated diagram indeed illustrated how the multidisciplinary LCs were perceived to develop. The CLD became more extensive and consequently further explained three aspects: the complexity and interrelatedness of group dynamics, gaining insights through exchange, and conditions to execute actions. To ensure adequate group dynamics, learning, and action execution, LC stakeholders can regularly use the CLD as a blueprint to identify solutions for LC bottlenecks, such as members limitedly arranging the LC jointly. Future research is needed to investigate whether such developments are caused by different LC project phases and/or by the number of LC meetings and reflections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.