Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808658›Full record

SynthesisColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2025

Association between anastomotic leak after rectal resection and bowel dysfunction, a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Sameh Hany Emile, Roberta Lynn Oslin, Anjelli Wignakumar, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Steven D Wexner, Marylise Boutros

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Association between anastomotic leak after rectal resection and bowel dysfunction, a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Anastomotic leakage increases the risk of major low anterior resection syndrome 3 years after rectal cancer surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sameh Hany EmileEllen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7854-5244
Roberta Lynn OslinEllen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA.
Anjelli WignakumarEllen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA.
Nir HoreshEllen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA.
Zoe GaroufaliaEllen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA.
Steven D WexnerEllen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8046-5753
Marylise BoutrosEllen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnastomotic leak (AL) after colorectal anastomosis can be a risk factor for bowel dysfunction, namely low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The present study aimed to assess bowel dysfunction in patients who developed AL after anterior resection compared to patients without AL.

methodsWe conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library for randomized and observational studies investigating the association between AL after anterior resection and bowel dysfunction. The main outcomes were LARS, faecal incontinence and urgency. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted to calculate the relative risk (RR) of the study outcomes and their 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsThis review included 20 retrospective studies comprising 4764 patients (61.6% male, median age 63 years). AL was detected in 14% of patients and those who experienced AL had a higher risk of LARS (six studies; 1329 patients, RR: 1.27 95%CI: 1.02, 1.58, p = 0.035), major LARS (seven studies; 1395 patients, RR: 1.38, 95%CI: 1.07, 1.79, p = 0.012), urgency (five studies; 955 patients, RR: 1.15, 95%CI: 1.04, 1.27, p = 0.005) and had higher LARS scores (seven studies; 1450 patients, WMD: 6.64, 95%CI: 3.76, 9.52, p < 0.001) and Wexner incontinence scores (seven studies; 1045 patients, WMD: 1.72, 95%CI: 0.16, 3.28, p = 0.031).

conclusionBased on low to moderate certainty evidence, AL after colorectal and coloanal anastomoses was significantly associated with an increased risk of LARS, particularly major LARS, urgency and higher LARS and Wexner/Cleveland Clinic Florida-Fecal Incontinence Scores.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakFecal IncontinenceProctectomyRectumAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsanastomotic leakanterior resectionbowel dysfunctioncolorectalLARSsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40808658
PMCPMC12351426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.