ArticleDigital health
A qualitative study exploring physiotherapists' insights on the design and development of technology-enhanced gait and balance assessment systems for older adults.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the eruption of digital care systems for older adults, their benefits and challenges in clinical practice are uncertain. Objective: We aimed to explore physiotherapists' perspectives on technology-based gait and balance assessment systems for older adults and provide exploration insights to inform potential design requirements and candidate metrics for future systems. Methods: Qualitative research based on semi-structured interviews with 20 physiotherapists was conducted to examine physiotherapists' expertise in gait and balance evaluations (e.g., clinical processes, tests, and metrics), constraints and obstacles during clinical practices, and perspectives on the essential attributes and functionalities of optimal technology-infused systems. Results: Findings indicate the Berg Balance Scale and movements of the pelvis, hip, knee, and feet are crucial for assessment. In addressing the constraints of conventional clinical assessments, technology-driven platforms enable the ongoing surveillance of daily movements and the quantification of kinematic measures. Physiotherapists also emphasized the significance of technology-integrated systems, accentuating physiotherapy-led evaluations, safety protocols, and non-intrusiveness. Conclusion: This study serves as an effort to bridge the gap between technological progressions and real-world implementations through the lens of physiotherapists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.