ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Diagnostic, therapeutic, and surgical repair trends in slipping rib syndrome: a survey of surgeons in the United States.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diagnostic, therapeutic and surgical techniques for slipping rib syndrome (SRS) are evolving to improve clinical outcomes and recurrence. Our objective was to evaluate current practice patterns in SRS diagnosis and treatment among surgeons nationally. Methods: An electronic survey was nationally distributed to surgeons who were identified as slipped rib repair providers to assess trends in diagnosis and treatment. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results: Twenty-four surgeons responded to the survey (45.3%). Almost half identified as thoracic surgeons (47.6%, n=10); 23.8% identified as pediatric surgeons (n=5), 23.8% as trauma/acute care surgeons (n=5), and 4.8% as general surgeons (n=1). Patient history (54.2%, n=13) and physical exam (70.8%, n=17) were reported as most important diagnostic factors. Of surgeons who utilized preoperative and intraoperative pain regimens, rib blocks with lidocaine were the most common (92.9%, n=13). Suturing of ribs/cartilage was identified as the most integral step in the slipped rib repair operation (70.8%, n=17), followed by excision of rib cartilage (66.7%, n=16), use of a biodegradable plate (54.2%, n=13) and utilizing excised rib cartilage as a spacer (29.2%, n=7). Trauma or inciting event was reported as a positive prognostic factor for post-operative pain relief (82.6%, n=19). Connective tissue disorder (58.3%, n=14) and hypermobility disorder (45.8%, n=11) were identified as the two most common factors associated with recurrence. Conclusions: This national survey of surgeons demonstrates high variability in management and expected outcomes related to diagnosis and treatment for SRS. Further research is needed to identify optimal patient selection and operative approach and long-term clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.