ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Sternal advancement surgery for pectus excavatum: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiac and respiratory function outcomes.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common malformation of the anterior chest wall, affecting around 1 in 400 births, with a male/female sex ratio of 5:1. Even if the functional repercussions and management of PE are still the subject of many debates, the cardiorespiratory function improvement after surgical correction of PE with sternal advancement seem to be confirmed in the recent literature. This study aims to assess the impact of sternal advancement surgery-specifically minimally invasive repair of PE (MIRPE) and sternochondroplasty-on cardiorespiratory function at rest and during exercise in patients with PE. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted on 21 studies reporting pre- and post-operative cardiac and/or respiratory function at rest and during exercise. Results: A total of 1,087 patients (mean age, 18.93 years) were included. Significant improvements were found in resting cardiac function, including cardiac output (P=0.04), cardiac index (P=0.03), left ventricular systolic ejection volume (LVSEV, P=0.001), and ejection fraction (P=0.03). Exercise capacity also improved significantly, with increases in VO Conclusions: Cardiac output assessment should be central to surgical decision-making in PE. Techniques involving sternal mobilization can yield meaningful improvements in cardiopulmonary function, unlike procedures that do not remodel the osteocartilaginous deformity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.