ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Developing a procedure mimicking transvaginal mesh implantation in women in a modified POP rat model.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to establish a simple and reproducible transvaginal mesh surgery rat model based on the modified pelvic organ prolapse rat model. Methods: A total of 24 10-week-old female nulliparous Wistar rats were used in this study. The control group consisted of six rats with no interventions. The ovariectomy group included six rats that underwent bilateral ovariectomy. The pelvic organ prolapse group comprised 12 rats that underwent cervical pendant modeling 2 weeks after bilateral ovariectomy. Fourteen days post-modeling, six rats from the pelvic organ prolapse group underwent transvaginal mesh surgery. The rat pelvic organ prolapse quantification system was used to evaluate the prolapse condition of the rats before and after pelvic organ prolapse modeling, as well as after transvaginal mesh surgery. Vaginal wall tissue was collected to assess biomechanical changes before and after pelvic organ prolapse modeling. Additionally, vaginal wall and sacral ligament tissues were collected to evaluate structural changes and collagen alterations before and after pelvic organ prolapse modeling. Results: The pelvic organ prolapse rat model exhibits anatomical prolapse, biomechanical changes, and pathological changes, including collagen fiber rupture and reduced collagen density. In contrast, the transvaginal mesh rat model demonstrates anatomical recovery in prolapsed rats. Conclusion: This study successfully modified the pre-existing rat model of pelvic organ prolapse and effectively mimicked human transvaginal mesh surgery using this model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.